View Single Post
Old 01-17-2015, 07:18 PM   #8 (permalink)
SilvrSRT10's Avatar
Super Moderator

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,249

Originally Posted by cce1302 View Post
Yeah, that was the comment I'm referring to. It's out of line. Whether you used the word guilty or not, your implication was obvious, and still is.

The point made in the article that these police officers may be seeing those pictured on their targets when they're armed on duty should be enough to give a person second thoughts about the idea.
You're reading more into my comments than was inferred.
SilvrSRT10 is offline   Reply With Quote