Go Back   Weapons Forum > Member's Area > The Lounge



The Lounge

This statment hangs on my home office wall.


This is a discussion on This statment hangs on my home office wall. within the The Lounge forums, part of the Member's Area category!
...


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-2012, 10:11 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
GLOCK V's Avatar
Full Access Member

 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: over the rainbow
Age: 49
Posts: 512
Default This statment hangs on my home office wall.

“The Gun Is Civilization” By Maj. L. Caudill, USMC (Ret)

Human beings only have two ways to deal with one another: reason and force. If you want me to do something for you, you have a choice of either convincing me via argument, or force me to do your bidding under threat of force. Every human interaction falls into one of those two categories, without exception. Reason or force, that’s it.

In a truly moral and civilized society, people exclusively interact through persuasion. Force has no place as a valid method of social interaction, and the only thing that removes force from the menu is the personal firearm, as paradoxical as it may sound to some.

When I carry a gun, you cannot deal with me by force. You have to use reason and try to persuade me, because I have a way to negate your threat or employment of force.

The gun is the only personal weapon that puts a 100-pound woman on equal footing with a 220-pound mugger, a 75-year old retiree on equal footing with a 19-year old gang banger, and a single guy on equal footing with a carload of drunk guys with baseball bats. The gun removes the disparity in physical strength, size, or numbers between a potential attacker and a defender.

There are plenty of people who consider the gun as the source of bad force equations. These are the people who think that we’d be more civilized if all guns were removed from society, because a firearm makes it easier for a [armed] mugger to do his job. That, of course, is only true if the mugger’s potential victims are mostly disarmed either by choice or by legislative fiat – it has no validity when most of a mugger’s potential marks are armed.

People who argue for the banning of arms ask for automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many, and that’s the exact opposite of a civilized society. A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force monopoly.

Then there’s the argument that the gun makes confrontations lethal that otherwise would only result in injury. This argument is fallacious in several ways. Without guns involved, confrontations are won by the physically superior party inflicting overwhelming injury on the loser.

People who think that fists, bats, sticks, or stones don’t constitute lethal force watch too much TV, where people take beatings and come out of it with a bloody lip at worst. The fact that the gun makes lethal force easier works solely in favor of the weaker defender, not the stronger attacker. If both are armed, the field is level.

The gun is the only weapon that’s as lethal in the hands of an octogenarian as it is in the hands of a weight lifter. It simply wouldn’t work as well as a force equalizer if it wasn’t both lethal and easily employable.

When I carry a gun, I don’t do so because I am looking for a fight, but because I’m looking to be left alone. The gun at my side means that I cannot be forced, only persuaded. I don’t carry it because I’m afraid, but because it enables me to be unafraid. It doesn’t limit the actions of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those who would do so by force. It removes force from the equation… And that’s why carrying a gun is a civilized act.

By Maj. L. Caudill USMC (Ret.)
__________________
I WILL GIVE UP MY GUN WHEN YOU PRY IT FROM MY COLD DEAD FINGERS.
GLOCK V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 10:33 PM   #2 (permalink)
Full Access Member

 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: florida
Age: 69
Posts: 6,132
Default

Funny how us jar heads think a like.
kwo51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 12:33 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
BOJANGLES's Avatar
Full Access Member

 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: TX
Age: 38
Posts: 83
Default

That was a good read
BOJANGLES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 01:16 PM   #4 (permalink)
Full Access Member

 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 367
Default

Good essay, but not by Maj Caudill. It was written by Marko Kloos.

At some point, for some reason, Maj Caudill's name was attached to it in error.

http://munchkinwrangler.wordpress.co...-civilization/
cce1302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 01:39 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
RangerDanger's Avatar
Full Access Member

 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: SE TX
Age: 44
Posts: 1,540
Default

No matter who wrote it that was a good read
__________________
Sua Sponte
RangerDanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 06:58 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
GLOCK V's Avatar
Full Access Member

 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: over the rainbow
Age: 49
Posts: 512
Default

Originally Posted by cce1302 View Post
Good essay, but not by Maj Caudill. It was written by Marko Kloos.

At some point, for some reason, Maj Caudill's name was attached to it in error.

http://munchkinwrangler.wordpress.co...-civilization/
Wow thanks i didnt know that.. As said still good words to think about for the non gun folks.
__________________
I WILL GIVE UP MY GUN WHEN YOU PRY IT FROM MY COLD DEAD FINGERS.
GLOCK V is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On